Find anything…
-
Fresh off the assembly belt…
- Brain processes: A tale of two outcomes
- False-positive brain: Do you really have to correct for multiple comparisons in an analysis of variance?
- Scaling the brain: Is it dishonest to truncate your y-axis?
- Deceived brain – Can twitter followers differentiate real and false memories
- Continuity of self: Was the world put into place five minutes ago?
Random tweets
Load More...Sleep strengthens integration of spatial memory systems https://t.co/XhD8cUKqNC
Sad to come on Twitter to find, to my surprise, this publication. This single-author review is based largely upon our *team* efforts over the past 1.5 yrs, which built a conceptual framework to test active, reactive & passive social media use, supported by internal funding (1/2) https://t.co/qJSiH4C8F5
Category Archives: Statistics
Brain processes: A tale of two outcomes
Recently, I started thinking about the chances of finding that one process is involved in two separate functions. If it affects these functions completely independently and they also do not affect each other, it seems intuitive that finding both functions … Continue reading
Posted in Experiment, Statistics
Tagged methods, multiple outcomes, power, statistics, stats
Leave a comment
False-positive brain: Do you really have to correct for multiple comparisons in an analysis of variance?
If your stats class was anything like mine, you learned that using ANOVA instead of t-tests is a sneaky way to avoid the multiple testing problem. I still believed this until very recently and a lot of my colleagues are … Continue reading
Posted in Methods, Statistics
3 Comments
Scaling the brain: Is it dishonest to truncate your y-axis?
So, the other day I responded to a tweet by Felix Schönbrodt. He called out a tweet by GESIS – Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften that showed data on life satisfaction in Germany from 2010 to 2016 without a y-axis (below left). … Continue reading
Posted in Data visualization, Methods, Statistics
Leave a comment
